Few
satirists could have conceived of such a scene. It was too perfect in its
surreal edge. With Ariel Sharon lying entombed, Tony Blair took his position at
the nearby podium and gave one of his usual performances. Sporting a yarmulke,
most unnaturally, Tony oozed counterfeit solemnity “The same iron determination
he took to the field of war he took to the chamber of diplomacy. Bold.
Unorthodox. Unyielding.”
I
wander what kind of ‘iron determination’
it takes to slaughter 69 unarmed and defenceless villagers of Qibya. Sharon
later claimed that his men had no idea there were still people living in the
homes that they were bombarding with gunfire and grenades. It was this sort of
conduct that led David Ben-Gurion to dub the young man “a pathological liar”. No
doubt the twenty to fifty unarmed and defenceless refugees killed at al-Bureig
were witnesses to similar displays of iron.
Both took place in 1953 at the hands of Unit 101 led by the departed commander
on ‘reprisal’ attacks. We’re talking
retaliation for the deaths of two or three people probably. Today the Israeli
military still lacks a sense of proportionality, let alone any comprehension of
the immorality of revenge. It was just the beginning for young Arik. He would
soon be storming across the Sinai alongside Anglo-French forces determined to
snatch back the Suez Canal.
Wherever
the man went there seemed to be Arabs falling to the ground dead. At the battle
of Mitla 260 Egyptians were left dead. The battle became a subject of
controversy (a euphemism in common usage) as some claimed Sharon deliberately
engaged in unauthorised aggression. General Sharon would later return to the
Sinai with Israel’s most powerful forces in 1967 at the battle of Abu-Ageila.
Then in the Yom Kippur War, Sharon disobeyed the orders of his superiors and
instead set out to engage the Egyptian army across the Suez Canal. In doing so
the General initiated a turning point in the war and was set in time as a hero
of military might from then on. The fact that the General had graduated by then
to terrorizing the inhabitants of Gaza and north-eastern Sinai isn’t so heroic.
It went as far as expelling 10,000 farmers, bulldozing their homes, and
destroying their farmland to make way for settlement. This is how Sharon earned
the title of Bulldozer.
Around
this time the Bulldozer had become enamoured with an array of right-wing forces
taking shape into what would become the Likud Party. Ever mercurial, Sharon
jumped at the chance to advise a Labour Zionist government before attempting to
stand as the Likud candidate for 1977 only to find he wasn’t the favourite. He
had been refused any support by mainstream parties, so he founded a small party
to win himself a seat, and managed to barter his way into Begin’s Likud
government. Sharon was the Minister of Agriculture for 4 years before being
promoted to Minister of Defence. That was his proper place after all. Notably,
as right-wing as Menachem Begin was he did believe in the rule of law to some
extent and torture almost stopped for 4 years. The hiatus came to a close when
the Bulldozer became Defence Minister.
The
new Defence Minister had his priorities in order. Time interviewed Sharon and
he showed no time for throat-clearing and spoke bluntly “I believe that the
starting point for a solution is to establish a Palestinian state in that part
of Palestine that was separated from what was to become Israel in 1922 and
which is now Jordan.” He had known from early on that the Palestinians had to
be restricted to cantons in order for settlements to be expanded further and
further. The end was an Israel with its territory stretching from the
Mediterranean to the Jordan. But he knew he could not do this alone.
When
it came to regional power Lebanon became the battleground for Israel and Syria
and the various forces aligned to either side and those caught in between. The
General took the side of the Maronite Christian militias and especially the
Phalange Party founded by Pierre Gemayel out of admiration for Hitler. The aim
of a client state in Lebanon was what spurred Sharon to action. Then came the
massacre at Sabra and Shatila. It just so happened that the camp of Palestinian
refugees was under Sharon’s watchful gaze when the Phalange came to flush out
the “terrorists”. The Israeli troops stood by and watched for nearly 3 days as
the rampage snuffed the life out of 1,700 human beings. Bold. Unorthodox. Unyielding.
This
is a rather light overview of the atrocities Sharon committed. Why then would
he be heralded as a ‘peacemaker’ exactly?
Anyone with this record would expect to never hold such a prominent position
ever again. He lost his job after much protest, but he bided his time. After
the failures of the Labour governments of the 1990s and amidst the Second
Intifada the old man took advantage of the rightward lurch overtaking the
country. He pledged no negotiations with the Palestinians until the Intifada
ended. The so-called “peace plan” that Sharon proposed, and partially
initiated, amounted to relinquishing 42% of the West Bank and establishing a ‘security
barrier’ (longer than the Berlin Wall) to annex around 50% of the occupied
territories. To this end Sharon reinvented himself as a man of peace and
transferred around 9,000 Gaza settlers to the Negev and the West Bank. It’s
clear what the real prize was in his mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment