The coup
against Jeremy Corbyn has now fully transmuted into a leadership
election. But the key challengers are unlikely to win over the
membership: whether it is lacklustre Angela Eagle, or the mediocre
Owen Smith. Corbyn is officially on the ballot, albeit with new
barriers to his supporters. Sadly the contest may take until
September to conclude, while the Conservative government is busy
regrouping.
Things are
moving very quickly. Not long ago, there was a great deal of anxiety
over the NEC vote on whether or not to allow Corbyn to remain on the
ballot paper. Many feared Labour would deny the incumbent the right
to defend his position from Angela Eagle. The Blairites are cynical
enough to take this decision. It would have been a transparent move
to overthrow the leader and close the democratic opening within the
party. But we shouldn't forget this almost happened.
Much like the no-confidence
motion, the NEC held the ballot in secret. The point being to
embolden the anti-Corbyn vote, as it had done with the no-confidence
motion. This same method allowed 80% of the PLP to fall into line
with the Blairite coup. Yet even with the secret ballot, the Corbyn
camp won the NEC vote by a modest margin (18:14) and now NEC
elections may see the balance of votes turn in the Left's favour.
However, the NEC rammed
through new measures, once Corbyn and his allies were out of the
room, to deny 128,000 members the right to vote and suspend all
branch meetings until after the election. This should not surprise
anyone. The Labour Party has a long tradition of rigging its internal
contests for the sake of 'unity' and 'stability'. Democracy and
contestation is a threat to this Tammany Hall system.
The enemy revealed
First, Angela Eagle emerged
to take on Corbyn, but now Owen Smith has entered the field. Smith
represents a division in the anti-Corbyn faction, where Eagle is not
seen as necessarily the best candidate to take on the leader. He is
now positioning himself to be the single challenger to face Jeremy
Corbyn. He has called for a second EU referendum, appealing to the
liberal europhiles so easily disenchanted with Corbynism. It's an
appeal to the muesli belt.
Overall, the Smith campaign
looks like a serious bid for power. The Pontypridd MP vows to refocus
efforts on inequality. He has proposed a £200 billion investment
programme to build housing, colleges, hospitals and improve existing
infrastructure. Smith was self-aware enough to outmatch Stephen
Crabb's call for a £100 billion plan. He's even pledged to bring in
a war powers act to ensure no future government can take the country
to war without parliamentary support.
This coming from a man, who
was not in Parliament to vote for the Iraq war, surely strengthens
his bid for the leadership. But it's not entirely accurate to say
Smith is anti-war. In the past, Owen Smith has expressed support for
the occupation of Iraq on Eustonite grounds – going as far as to
compare the conflict to the Spanish civil war. This was long before
Hilary Benn used the same analogy to support the invasion of Syria.
Meanwhile the Eagle campaign
has been markedly lukewarm. So far Angela Eagle has succeeded in
winning over sympathy with questionable claims of intimidation by
leftists. Her debut was spoiled by Theresa May's victory after Andrea
Leadsom pulled out of the Tory leadership race. The journalists
rushed out of the room to cover the real news. But even when Eagle
gets airtime, she fails to inspire. It looks like a kamikaze
candidacy.
The aim is victory through
destruction. The Blairites and the 'soft left' are trying to use
Angela Eagle as a front to slam the Labour leadership. The election
will be dragged out over the summer to guarantee maximum damage. The
Labour Right would prefer to see Corbyn fail than see him challenge
the Tory government. This is just as the government is largely
rudderless. A united opposition could have serious impact right now.
Perilous terrain
Faced with Smith, the Corbyn
camp has returned to its own take on quantitative easing. John
McDonnell has laid out plans for a national investment bank and £500
billion programme for infrastructure. It would be coupled with
regional banks to increase the level of investment to the North and
the Midlands. This not only tops Smith's position, it is a return to
Corbynomics – a radical mix of heterodox Keynesian and
post-socialist economic policies.
If Corbyn combines a well
thought out platform with a social media strategy and grass-roots
organising, the leader should be able to win with a landslide.
Victory has to be total here, or it will embolden the anti-Corbyn
faction to draw their knives later. It's not just a matter of having
the right ideas and decency. The extreme centrists want to recapture
the party leadership, and they are willing to ruin its electoral
chances to do so.
Not surprisingly, Jeremy
Corbyn has fallen back on tried and tested social media networks.
This allows Corbyn to connect with his base in a much more direct way
than his competitors. It does have limits, though it is the best
option. The real battle is how Corbyn can assert influence in the
media and reach a mass audience. He recently gave a pretty relaxed
interview to the BBC in Finsbury Park. But the press is still
overwhelmingly hostile to the Left.
The main problem is not the
right-wing press, but the lack of a left-wing press. The Guardian,
the Observer, the Independent and the New Statesman have led the herd
of independent minds. This herd includes liberals and leftists who
take issue with Corbyn's idealism. Even the Daily Mirror, the only
Labour red-top newspaper, called for Corbyn to let the coup plotters
win. So there is no progressive commentariat backing the Labour
leader.
The Corbyn leadership faces
the difficulty of getting the word out in a hostile media
environment. At the same time, the party is locked into a crisis
which predates the last nine months and goes back to the compromises
of Blairism and even before. The redistribution of power and wealth
was always offset to secure gains within the system. Now there is the
real struggle to transform the party in order to change the country.
This article was originally published at Souciant.
No comments:
Post a Comment