A few days after the massive student demonstration against
cuts and tuition fees I emailed Noam Chomsky, who has been involved in
activism and civil disobedience for almost 50 years, to see what he
thought to the protests in London. But also other issues such as the
European approach to deficit reduction and the "special relationship"
between Britain and America. Have a read and please comment.
JW:
There was a mass-demonstration in London yesterday organised by the
National Union of Students and others in response to the cuts to
public education and tuition fee hikes by the Con-Dem Coalition.
Turn-out is said to have been 52,000 or maybe more, which is a
considerable turn-out given that the Coalition has only been in power
since May. The media gave the demonstrations some coverage but it was
only when students smashed windows at Millbank Towers and broke into
the Conservative Party HQ that the press really began to "focus" on the
story. The media covered the story as if there had been a terrorist
attack on Millbank Towers and hundreds of Conservatives had been
killed, when in actuality only 14 people were injured - 7 police
officers and 7 students. Do you think the students undermined the cause
by resorting to, what the press calls, violence?
Many
European countries, including Britain, are implementing "austerity
measures" that could amount to the end of the welfare state and social
democracy. It is often emphasised by commentators that these
"austerity measures" are not being followed in the United States. In the
UK the Coalition has "ring-fenced" defence spending and it has been
suggested that is because the US government is opposed to cuts to
defence budgets in Britain. This may also explain why the Liberals in
the government have gone back on their campaign promises to scrap the
Trident missile system, in Britain we call this the "special
relationship" without irony. What do you think of the "special
relationship" between Britain and America?
NC:
I noticed that an international anarchist federation, which strongly
supported the protest, condemned the resort to force and suggested it
might have been provocateurs. If so, it wouldn’t have been the first
time. At best, it’s a tactical error, in my opinion, achieving nothing
positive and offering the media the opportunity to suppress the issues
and concentrate on injuring people. That’s an old story.
The
austerity measures in the UK are, I believe, class war. Even
conservative economists recognize that England’s deficit is not large
by historical standards. I think the UK and the EU generally are
making a serious mistake – or more cynically, a class-based policy --
by focusing on austerity rather than stimulating the economy in which
case the deficit, such as it is, will be taken care of naturally down
the road. I’m not usually a cheer-leader for Obama, but his position
on this issue at G-20 was better than that of Europe, though he didn’t
go anywhere near far enough. Obama picked a deficit commission headed
by two right-wing deficit hawks, who just released a report that has
pretty much the Cameron-style class war character. It’s not as bad as
the UK – yet. As for the “special relationship,” that was defined by a
high-level JFK adviser at the peak of the missile crisis in 1962, when
US planners were taking actions that they knew might incinerate
England while leaving the US untouched, and were refusing even to
inform the British government. The “special relationship” means that
“Britain is our lieutenant, the fashionable word is `partner’.” The
British prefer to hear the fashionable word.
No comments:
Post a Comment